What is the legal ruling on relying solely on bank transfers as evidence to prove a claim that extends beyond the mere act of transfer, and what is the judicial procedure followed when such evidence is deemed insufficient?

Bank transfers serve as evidence for the fact of the transfer itself. However, they may not be sufficient to prove the purpose or underlying reason for the transfer if it is subject to dispute. In the absence of other clear evidence supporting the claim, the court may administer an oath to the other party to affirm or deny the claim, in accordance with Article (92/2) of the Law of Evidence.