Verified Legal Answer Saudi Law 🇸🇦 العربية

What is the legal ruling concerning private instruments submitted as evidence in a lawsuit when the party to whom they are attributed is absent and does not deny them?

4 views · 1 day ago

Legal Answer

Radiif AI Legal Assistant

⚡ Quick Answer:

Private instruments are considered binding proof against the party to whom they are attributed, unless that party explicitly denies the signature, seal, or fingerprint attributed to them. Should the party to whom these instruments are attributed be absent and not deny them, they shall be considered valid evidence that can...

Private instruments are considered binding proof against the party to whom they are attributed, unless that party explicitly denies the signature, seal, or fingerprint attributed to them. Should the party to whom these instruments are attributed be absent and not deny them, they shall be considered valid evidence that can be invoked.
Source: Radiif.com (رديف) · Saudi Legal AI Platform

Legal References & Citations

1
مبدأ قضائي - Article مبدأ

الفقرة الأولى من المادة التاسعة والعشرين من نظام الإثبات الصادر بالمرسوم ملكي رقم (م/43) وتاريخ 1443/5/26هـ

Share this answer:

About Radiif

Radiif is an AI legal platform specialized in Saudi Arabian law, providing answers verified by legal references and articles.

This answer is for general legal education and is not legal advice. Please consult a licensed attorney for your specific case.

Page Stats

Views 4
Citations 1
Language English 🇺🇸

Do you have specific details about your case?

Ask Radiif AI Legal Assistant now and get verified answers with exact citations from Saudi law.

Direct Legal Consultation

Do you want to consult a certified lawyer for this case?

We can suggest a list of certified lawyers with extensive expertise specifically in this domain.